{
  "id": 8654701,
  "name": "EAST CAROLINA LUMBER COMPANY v. HYDE COUNTY LAND AND LUMBER COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "East Carolina Lumber Co. v. Hyde County Land & Lumber Co.",
  "decision_date": "1923-10-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "769",
  "last_page": "769",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "186 N.C. 769"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1122,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.482,
    "sha256": "2ca2065874c282441428e212fb2b55e85955daa4552f77a6292c258ea1a4994a",
    "simhash": "1:ced2336fd71f3579",
    "word_count": 187
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:10:30.005509+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "EAST CAROLINA LUMBER COMPANY v. HYDE COUNTY LAND AND LUMBER COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe controversy on trial narrowed itself principally to questions of fact, which the jury alone could determine. After a careful perusal of the record, we are \u25a0 satisfied that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to the law bearing on the subject, and no sufficient reason has been found by us for disturbing the verdict and judgment entered below. The chief exceptions are directed to alleged errors in the charge and to the court\u2019s refusal to grant the defendant\u2019s motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit. We have discovered nothing which would entitle the defendant to .a new trial or to a dismissal.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. H. Lee and Whitehurst & Barden for plaintiff.",
      "S. 8. Mann and Ward & Ward for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "EAST CAROLINA LUMBER COMPANY v. HYDE COUNTY LAND AND LUMBER COMPANY.\n(Filed 17 October, 1923.)\nAppeal by defendant from Qrady, J., at April Term, 1923, of CRAVEN.\nCivil action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract, relating to the manufacture and sale of certain designated lumber.\nFrom a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appealed, assigning errors.\nW. H. Lee and Whitehurst & Barden for plaintiff.\nS. 8. Mann and Ward & Ward for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0769-01",
  "first_page_order": 833,
  "last_page_order": 833
}