{
  "id": 8654769,
  "name": "BENJAMIN LEONARD v. WILMINGTON, BRUNSWICK AND SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Leonard v. Wilmington, Brunswick & Southern Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1923-11-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "773",
  "last_page": "773",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "186 N.C. 773"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 98,
    "char_count": 944,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.466,
    "sha256": "7777e9ed650f713d04e127737a462c81b29394deadf4337e3b91cf5ba5808c81",
    "simhash": "1:5e6d7457227580ca",
    "word_count": 152
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:10:30.005509+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BENJAMIN LEONARD v. WILMINGTON, BRUNSWICK AND SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nThe case below resolved itself into controverted issues of fact, which the jury has settled by its verdict. No new or novel question of law is presented by the appeal, and we have found .no error on the record. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "G. Ed. Taylor for plaintiff.",
      "Robert W. Davis for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BENJAMIN LEONARD v. WILMINGTON, BRUNSWICK AND SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY.\n(Filed 7 November, 1923.)\nAppeal by defendant from Sinclair, J., at January Term, 1923, of BbuNswicK.\nCivil action tried upon the following issues:\n\u201c1. \"Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant railroad company, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: \u2018Yes.\u2019\n\u201c2. Did the plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to his injury ? Answer: No.\u2019\n\u201c3. What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover from the defendant railroad company? Answer: '$600.\u2019\u201d\nJudgment on the verdict for the plaintiff. Defendant appealed.\nG. Ed. Taylor for plaintiff.\nRobert W. Davis for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0773-01",
  "first_page_order": 837,
  "last_page_order": 837
}