{
  "id": 8654788,
  "name": "ISAAC SMITH v. LIGGETT & MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.",
  "decision_date": "1923-11-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "774",
  "last_page": "774",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "186 N.C. 774"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 89,
    "char_count": 816,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.461,
    "sha256": "817f2f9f64b62a727961d2ad5ca5a1900cb47841749b2c881106e6a90d2087cc",
    "simhash": "1:970a4406e8b8c5f4",
    "word_count": 129
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:10:30.005509+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ISAAC SMITH v. LIGGETT & MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nThe evidence bearing upon the defendants\u2019 alleged negligence was conflicting, but the jury has accepted the defendants\u2019 version of the matter and answered the issue against the plaintiff. We have found no substantial or prejudicial error in the trial; hence the verdict and judgment as rendered will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. 0. Hams for plaintiff.",
      "Fuller & Fuller for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ISAAC SMITH v. LIGGETT & MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY et al.\n(Filed 7 November, 1923.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Bond, J., at April Term, 1923, of Dueham.\nCivil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury.\nThe usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages were submitted to the jury, with the result that the first issue was answered in favor of the defendants. .Plaintiff appealed, assigning errors.\nE. 0. Hams for plaintiff.\nFuller & Fuller for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0774-01",
  "first_page_order": 838,
  "last_page_order": 838
}