{
  "id": 8654869,
  "name": "JOHN BLACKWELL v. PROXIMITY MANUFACTURING COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Blackwell v. Proximity Manufacturing Co.",
  "decision_date": "1923-12-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "779",
  "last_page": "779",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "186 N.C. 779"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "182 N. C., 205",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8655692
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/182/0205-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 92,
    "char_count": 839,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.491,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20763256853971024
    },
    "sha256": "59d208c115574aa54d63260ecb5196a84670daa42356803201a416d761d81a9f",
    "simhash": "1:cceff57e8816bf2b",
    "word_count": 139
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:10:30.005509+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JOHN BLACKWELL v. PROXIMITY MANUFACTURING COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nLet tbe verdict and judgment in this case be upheld, as tbe record presents no reversible error. Cook v. Mfg. Co., 182 N. C., 205.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "S. B. Adams, R. O. Strudwiclc, and Geo. A. Younce for plaintiff.",
      "King, Sapp & King\u25a0 for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JOHN BLACKWELL v. PROXIMITY MANUFACTURING COMPANY.\n(Filed 5 December, 1923.)\nAppeal by defendant from Shaw, J., at August Teri\u00fa, 1923, of Guileoed.\nCivil action tried upon tbe following issues:\n\u201c1. Was tbe plaintiff injured by tbe negligence of tbe defendant, as alleged in tbe complaint? Answer: 'Tes.\u2019\n\u201c2. Did tbe plaintiff, by bis own negligence, contribute to bis own injury, as alleged in tbe answer? Answer: 'No.\u2019\n''3. What damage, if any, is tbe plaintiff entitled to recover of tbe defendant ? Answer: '$448.\u2019 \u201d\nJudgment on tbe verdict in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appealed.\nS. B. Adams, R. O. Strudwiclc, and Geo. A. Younce for plaintiff.\nKing, Sapp & King\u25a0 for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0779-01",
  "first_page_order": 843,
  "last_page_order": 843
}