{
  "id": 8655385,
  "name": "G. M. BEAM, Administrator HERBERT L. JONES, v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Beam v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1924-03-26",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "854",
  "last_page": "854",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 N.C. 854"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 972,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.466,
    "sha256": "615ece16a73f0bc14d76cc49e29f413095bb3638eddd380abbab169e14bd7e2d",
    "simhash": "1:5f28ad5af779f7fd",
    "word_count": 164
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:05:52.896945+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "G. M. BEAM, Administrator HERBERT L. JONES, v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe trial of this cause reduced itself to a controversy over issues of fact, wbicb the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record convinces us that the case has been tried substantially in accord with the settled principles of law bearing on the subject, and we have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which would seem to require another hearing. The case presents no new question.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jas. H. Pou, W. M. Person, G. M. Beam, and W. H. Yarborough for plaintiff.",
      "Murray Allen and B. T. Holden for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "G. M. BEAM, Administrator HERBERT L. JONES, v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY.\n(Filed 26 March, 1924.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Calvert, J., at August Term, 1923, of FeANICLIN.\nCivil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent killing of plaintiff\u2019s intestate.\nUpon denial of liability and issues joined, there was a verdict and judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.\nJas. H. Pou, W. M. Person, G. M. Beam, and W. H. Yarborough for plaintiff.\nMurray Allen and B. T. Holden for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0854-01",
  "first_page_order": 924,
  "last_page_order": 924
}