{
  "id": 8655428,
  "name": "B. E. PARHAM v. W. A. ADAMS COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Parham v. W. A. Adams Co.",
  "decision_date": "1924-04-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "856",
  "last_page": "856",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 N.C. 856"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 890,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.458,
    "sha256": "ce7bcdb62b47452388146da4b60f69812464badcebb4e5512a7736b5c71a996a",
    "simhash": "1:161230d742713ebc",
    "word_count": 150
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:05:52.896945+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "B. E. PARHAM v. W. A. ADAMS COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nUpon controverted issues of fact, tbe jury has determined tbe case in favor of plaintiff. A careful perusal of tbe record convinces us that tbe ease has been tried substantially in agreement with tbe law bearing on tbe subject, and we have discovered no ruling or. action on tbe part of tbe trial court which we apprehend' should be held for reversible error. There is nothing on tbe record which entitles tbe defendant to a new trial. Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hides & Stem for plaintiff.",
      "Parham. & Lassiter and D. G. Brummitt for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "B. E. PARHAM v. W. A. ADAMS COMPANY.\n(Filed 9 April, 1924.)\nAppeal by defendant from Devin, J., at October Term, 1923, of GRANVILLE.\nCivil action, to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury to plaintiff\u2019s tobacco.\nProm a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals, assigning errors.\nHides & Stem for plaintiff.\nParham. & Lassiter and D. G. Brummitt for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0856-01",
  "first_page_order": 926,
  "last_page_order": 926
}