{
  "id": 8655461,
  "name": "R. A. MARSHALL v. MECKLENBURG HIGHWAY COMMISSION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Marshall v. Mecklenburg Highway Commission",
  "decision_date": "1924-04-30",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "858",
  "last_page": "858",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 N.C. 858"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 971,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.452,
    "sha256": "34cb5467536c3df1b416bdbd45c5ce0a3b39d0bff475e4dc6107cee228f9f8cd",
    "simhash": "1:cc8fed4c56ab3c7c",
    "word_count": 167
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:05:52.896945+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "R. A. MARSHALL v. MECKLENBURG HIGHWAY COMMISSION."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nDefendant\u2019s chief exceptions, as stressed on the argument and in its brief, are those directed to portions of the court\u2019s charge on the measure of damages. Construing the charge as a whole, as we are required to do, we do not think it is susceptible to any serious defect. The case seems to have been tried in substantial compliance with the law' bearing on the subject, and no ruling or action on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error.\nThe validity of the proceeding will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "No counsel contra.",
      "J. L. DeLaney for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "R. A. MARSHALL v. MECKLENBURG HIGHWAY COMMISSION.\n(Filed 30 April, 1924.)\nAppeal by defendant from Stack, J., at February Term, 1924, of MECKLENBURG.\nCivil action, to recover damages for the relocating of a public road through the lands of the plaintiff.\nFrom a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff the defendant appeals, assigning errors.\nNo counsel contra.\nJ. L. DeLaney for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0858-01",
  "first_page_order": 928,
  "last_page_order": 928
}