{
  "id": 8655553,
  "name": "A. B. McCARTER v. ATLANTA AND CHARLOTTE AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY and THE SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "McCarter v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1924-05-31",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "863",
  "last_page": "864",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 N.C. 863"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "113 N. C., 240",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652694
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/113/0240-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "176 N. C., 152",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8655469
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/176/0152-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 106,
    "char_count": 1045,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.459,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20764260773504556
    },
    "sha256": "4aa2f1d5a44a654a87665023effa67564de13da533df52345d78c931145ac1db",
    "simhash": "1:3838731fd40eb3bd",
    "word_count": 173
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:05:52.896945+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "A. B. McCARTER v. ATLANTA AND CHARLOTTE AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY and THE SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Stacy, J.\nTbe Court being evenly divided in opinion \u2014 tbe death of Chief Justice Ciarle leaving only four members present \u2014 the judgment of tbe lower court is affirmed, and stands as tbe decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Miller v. Bank, 176 N. C., 152; Durham v. R. R., 113 N. C., 240.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Stacy, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mangum &\u2022 Denny for plaintiff.",
      "Oscar F. Mason and George B. Mason for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "A. B. McCARTER v. ATLANTA AND CHARLOTTE AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY and THE SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.\n(Filed 31 May, 1924.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Precedent\u2014Divided Court.\nWhen tlie Supreme Court is equally divided on appeal; tlie judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without establishing a precedent.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Staclc, J., at March Term, 1924, of GastON.\nCivil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury sustained by tbe plaintiff while in tbe discharge of bis duties as an employee of tbe defendant Southern Eailway Company.\nFrom a judgment of nonsuit entered at tbe close of plaintiff\u2019s evidence, plaintiff appeals.\nMangum &\u2022 Denny for plaintiff.\nOscar F. Mason and George B. Mason for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0863-02",
  "first_page_order": 933,
  "last_page_order": 934
}