{
  "id": 8655139,
  "name": "STATE v. WILLIAM PRESLEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Presley",
  "decision_date": "1924-09-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "813",
  "last_page": "814",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 N.C. 813"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "182 N. C., 835",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8659151
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/182/0835-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1148,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.464,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2076362367072366
    },
    "sha256": "9800d649c4ce212e5d06d89f0903d2fabd007a61d3c16fac5ed723b0a07d41c2",
    "simhash": "1:d829770c74e81443",
    "word_count": 190
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:44:41.585516+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. WILLIAM PRESLEY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Feb Cubxam.\nThere was ample evidence to carry tbe ease to tbe jury. Tbe exception based on tbe court\u2019s refusal to grant tbe defendant\u2019s motion for dismissal of tbe action or for judgment as of nonsuit, made first at tbe close of the State\u2019s evidence, and renewed at tlie close of all the evidence, must be overruled.\nThe remaining exceptions relating to the admission of certain evidence are fully met by what was said in S. v. Crouse, 182 N. C., 835.\nThe record presents no new or novel point of law, not heretofore settled by our decisions on the subject. The trial and judgment must be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Feb Cubxam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Manning and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.",
      "James P. Bunn and Lyn Bond for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. WILLIAM PRESLEY.\n(Filed 10 September, 1924.)\nAppeal by defendant from Bond, J., at March Term, 1924, of Edgecombe.\nCriminal prosecution, tried upon a warrant charging tbe defendant witb manufacturing spirituous liquors and witb aiding and abetting in their manufacture, contrary to tbe statutes in such cases made and provided, etc.\nFrom an adverse verdict, and judgment pronounced thereon, tbe defendant appeals.\nAttorney-General Manning and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.\nJames P. Bunn and Lyn Bond for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0813-01",
  "first_page_order": 883,
  "last_page_order": 884
}