{
  "id": 8655161,
  "name": "J. B. COLT CO., Inc., v. J. S. PROCTOR",
  "name_abbreviation": "J. B. Colt Co. v. Proctor",
  "decision_date": "1924-09-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "815",
  "last_page": "815",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 N.C. 815"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "184 N. C., 137",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11269437
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/184/0137-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 91,
    "char_count": 788,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.484,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20763642976868535
    },
    "sha256": "d00e97a9f07e8305c033af257db8e3bb8a4f152a77af37879229d7ac789cb143",
    "simhash": "1:4642519b2acb475f",
    "word_count": 134
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:44:41.585516+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. B. COLT CO., Inc., v. J. S. PROCTOR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nThis is a simple action of debt. The contract between the parties was in wilting, and is identical in terms with the instrument which was construed in Colt v. Turlington, 184 N. C., 137. we have found nothing on the record which entitles the defendant to anew trial. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Battle & Winslow, J. B. Ramsey and J. M. Alexander for plaintiff. E. B. Grantham for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. B. COLT CO., Inc., v. J. S. PROCTOR.\n(Filed 17 September, 1924.)\nAppeal by defendant from Bond, J., at February Term, 1924, of Nash.\nCivil action tried upon the following issue: \u201cIs the defendant, Proctor, indebted to the plaintiff company, and if so, in what amount ?\u201d \u201cYes, $196.35, with interest.\u201d\nJudgment on the verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.\nBattle & Winslow, J. B. Ramsey and J. M. Alexander for plaintiff. E. B. Grantham for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0815-01",
  "first_page_order": 885,
  "last_page_order": 885
}