{
  "id": 8655251,
  "name": "In re WILL OF JERRE HENDERSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Will of Henderson",
  "decision_date": "1924-10-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "819",
  "last_page": "820",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 N.C. 819"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1034,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.445,
    "sha256": "e760c92a2e5e93169cc4a2a40ee743dbc97894357cd45e83120331535894f7e8",
    "simhash": "1:efd2ecd5e72899cd",
    "word_count": 182
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:44:41.585516+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re WILL OF JERRE HENDERSON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee OueiaM.\nThe trial of this cause reduced itself to a controversy over an issue of fact which the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with, the impression that the issue has been tried substantially in agreement with the law bearing on the subject, and no ruling or action on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held fox legal or reversible error. The appeal presents no new or novel point of law not heretofore settled by our decisions. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee OueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George JR. Ward and H. D. Williams for caveators.",
      "O. B. Turner and Stevens, Beasley & Stevens for propounders."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re WILL OF JERRE HENDERSON.\n(Filed 1 October, 1924.)\nAppeal by propounders from Horton, J., at March Term, 1924, of Duplin.\nIssue of devisavit vel non, raised by a caveat to the will of Jerre Henderson. Alleged undue influence is the ground up.on which the caveat is based.\nFrom a verdict and judgment in favor of caveators the propounders appeal.\nGeorge JR. Ward and H. D. Williams for caveators.\nO. B. Turner and Stevens, Beasley & Stevens for propounders."
  },
  "file_name": "0819-02",
  "first_page_order": 889,
  "last_page_order": 890
}