{
  "id": 8655270,
  "name": "MILLARD MIAL v. H. A. UNDERWOOD",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mial v. Underwood",
  "decision_date": "1924-10-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "820",
  "last_page": "820",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 N.C. 820"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 61,
    "char_count": 419,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.468,
    "sha256": "c50703a9ad7011cd2601f2cde8e0d1fb8b7d3234060823dc22d0127a46193c53",
    "simhash": "1:e960fcafb6308071",
    "word_count": 76
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:44:41.585516+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MILLARD MIAL v. H. A. UNDERWOOD."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Oueiam.\nA careful examination of the record convinces us that this case has been tried in substantial compliance with the law, and that sufficient cause for a new trial has not been shown.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Oueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. W. Bailey and W. B. J ones for plaintiff.",
      "Willis Smith and B. C. Maxwell for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MILLARD MIAL v. H. A. UNDERWOOD.\n(Filed 8 October, 1924.)\nAppeal by defendant from Grady, J., at March Term, 1924, of \"Wake.\nJ. W. Bailey and W. B. J ones for plaintiff.\nWillis Smith and B. C. Maxwell for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0820-02",
  "first_page_order": 890,
  "last_page_order": 890
}