{
  "id": 8655305,
  "name": "In re WILL OF MRS. ROWENA ELIZABETH COLLINS",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Will of Collins",
  "decision_date": "1924-10-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "822",
  "last_page": "823",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 N.C. 822"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1133,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.466,
    "sha256": "172c2628727c19415d366257dc97c153cef25ea7d0d13dd3519517e174528444",
    "simhash": "1:719a265aef215f87",
    "word_count": 185
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:44:41.585516+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re WILL OF MRS. ROWENA ELIZABETH COLLINS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nSeveral serious exceptions have been entered on tbe record, but after a careful perusal of tbe whole case we are confirmed in tbe belief that substantial justice has been done, without violence to any legal principle. Therefore, the verdict and judgment as rendered below will be upheld. The appeal presents no new or novel point of law which would seem to warrant an extended discussion, or which, we apprehend, would be helpful or beneficial to the profession.\nSufficient merit has not been shown to upset the validity of the proceeding.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Marshall T. Spears, Clifford <& Townsend, and John R. Hood for caveators.",
      "Young, Best & Young, Franhlin T. Dupree, and Charles Ross for propounders."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re WILL OF MRS. ROWENA ELIZABETH COLLINS.\n(Filed 15 October, 1924.)\nAppeal by propounders from Midyette, J., at February Term, 1924, of HaRNETT.\nIssue of devisavit vel non, raised by a caveat to tbe will of Rowena Elizabeth Collins. Alleged mental incapacity and undue influence are tbe grounds upon which tbe caveat is based.\nFrom a verdict and judgment in favor of caveators tbe propounders appeal, assigning errors.\nMarshall T. Spears, Clifford <& Townsend, and John R. Hood for caveators.\nYoung, Best & Young, Franhlin T. Dupree, and Charles Ross for propounders."
  },
  "file_name": "0822-02",
  "first_page_order": 892,
  "last_page_order": 893
}