{
  "id": 8655353,
  "name": "STATE v. MONK ROSE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Rose",
  "decision_date": "1924-10-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "824",
  "last_page": "825",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 N.C. 824"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 66,
    "char_count": 529,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.431,
    "sha256": "7e433951c8f95a3aca1e7aa27cfd4cbad2c64e00a2e171cb4fdf43734168a361",
    "simhash": "1:2a28eaec509a0e8b",
    "word_count": 91
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:44:41.585516+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. MONK ROSE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee CueiaM.\nWe baye gone-over tbe record carefully, examined tbe briefs in tbe case, and can see no error in law.\nIt was a question of fact for tbe jury. Tbey have rendered tbeir yerdict of \u201cGuilty.\u201d We cannot disturb tbeir verdict or tbe judgment of tbe court below.\n\"We find\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee CueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Manning and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.",
      "J. W. Barbee for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. MONK ROSE.\n(Filed 29 October, 1924.)\nAppeal by defendant from Sinclair, J., and a jury, beard at February Term, 1924, of Dubham.\nAttorney-General Manning and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.\nJ. W. Barbee for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0824-02",
  "first_page_order": 894,
  "last_page_order": 895
}