{
  "id": 8655409,
  "name": "MANUFACTURERS FINANCE COMPANY and SUPERIOR MOTOR TRUCK COMPANY v. AMAZON COTTON MILLS COMPANY and R. E. ZIMMERMAN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Manufacturers Finance Co. v. Amazon Cotton Mills Co.",
  "decision_date": "1924-11-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "827",
  "last_page": "828",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 N.C. 827"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1487,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.459,
    "sha256": "f91546848a9521d0d9fe59054e2c1f6b77edfd75c94de7d9f16fc5d08c07f1ed",
    "simhash": "1:e9c043e138cdf7b5",
    "word_count": 255
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:44:41.585516+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MANUFACTURERS FINANCE COMPANY and SUPERIOR MOTOR TRUCK COMPANY v. AMAZON COTTON MILLS COMPANY and R. E. ZIMMERMAN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis case has been in this Court twice before\u2014Finance Co. v. Cotton Mills Co., 182 N. C., p. 408, and Finance Co. v. Cotton Mills Co., 187 N. C., p. 233.\nIn the latter case we said: \u201cWe think, from the facts and circumstances of this case, and the view we take, that the evidence above set forth, which was excluded, and like evidence as appears from the record, there was error, and on another trial the evidence should be held competent.\u201d\nFrom a careful reading of the record and briefs, and considering the exceptions and assignments of error, we think the case was substantially tried out in accordance with the opinion heretofore rendered. The material issue submitted to the jury was, \u201cDid the Manufacturers Finance Company purchase said note and contract, retaining title to the motor truck herein sued for, from the Superior Motor Truck Company, for value and before maturity, in good faith and in due course of business, without notice of the claim or equity of the Amazon Cotton Mills, as alleged in the complaint?\u201d The jury answered this issue \u201cYes.\u201d This was a question of fact. We can see no prejudicial or reversible error.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Brooks, Parker & Smith for plaintiffs.",
      "Paper & Paper and H. P. Eyser for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MANUFACTURERS FINANCE COMPANY and SUPERIOR MOTOR TRUCK COMPANY v. AMAZON COTTON MILLS COMPANY and R. E. ZIMMERMAN.\n(Filed 12 November, 1924.)\nAppeal by Amazon Cotton Mills Company from Bryson, J., and a jury, at July Term, 1924, of Davidsoh.\nBrooks, Parker & Smith for plaintiffs.\nPaper & Paper and H. P. Eyser for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0827-02",
  "first_page_order": 897,
  "last_page_order": 898
}