{
  "id": 8655446,
  "name": "A. J. CHESSON v. S. L. LYNCH and J. P. LYNCH",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chesson v. Lynch",
  "decision_date": "1924-11-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "829",
  "last_page": "830",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 N.C. 829"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1753,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.453,
    "sha256": "b23a69220c66fde59a777b57f28886e535bc09648be84de5bd71560579dcf294",
    "simhash": "1:f3822360b4feee57",
    "word_count": 306
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:44:41.585516+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "A. J. CHESSON v. S. L. LYNCH and J. P. LYNCH."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Oueiam.\nWhen this case was here before (186 N. C., p. 625) we said: \u201cThe nonsuit as to J. P. Lynch will be reversed and the entire ease remanded for a general new trial.\u201d\nThe material issue presented to the jury for consideration was as follows: \u201cDid the defendants unlawfully, willfully and wantonly conspire together to injure and injure the plaintiff in his property rights and position with the A. J. Ohesson Agricultural Company, as alleged in the complaint?\u201d The jury answered this issue \u201cYes.\u201d\nWe have examined the record carefully, and the exceptions and assignments of error. We have heard the arguments of counsel and examined their briefs, but can find no prejudicial or reversible error.\nThe defendants\u2019 assignments of error were:\n\u201cTbe defendants assign as error tbe refusal of tbe court to nonsuit tbe plaintiffs upon tbe grounds tbat upon tbe entire evidence in tbe case tbe plaintiff was not entitled to maintain tbe action set out in tbe complaint against tbe defendants.\n\u201cFor tbat bis Honor declined to set aside tbe verdict of tbe jury, for tbat as a matter of law tbe jury was not justified in answering tbe issues as found in tbe record, for tbat upon tbe entire evidence in tbe case tbe plaintiff was not entitled to damages upon tbe cause of action appearing in tbe evidence.\u201d\nWe tbink tbe pleadings and evidence showed a good cause of action. Tbe facts were for tbe jury. Tbey decided against tbe defendants. We can find\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Oueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bouse & Bouse, and Shaw, J ones & J ones, and Cowper, Whitaker & Allen for plaintiff.",
      "George M. Lindsay and O. H. Gui\u00f3n for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "A. J. CHESSON v. S. L. LYNCH and J. P. LYNCH.\n(Filed 12 November, 1924.)\nAppeal by defendants from Horton,- J., and a jury, at February Term, 1924, of Lenoie.\nBouse & Bouse, and Shaw, J ones & J ones, and Cowper, Whitaker & Allen for plaintiff.\nGeorge M. Lindsay and O. H. Gui\u00f3n for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0829-02",
  "first_page_order": 899,
  "last_page_order": 900
}