{
  "id": 8655498,
  "name": "R. T. HEATON and D. F. MEHAFFEY v. S. J. CALHOUN and G. I. CALHOUN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Heaton v. Calhoun",
  "decision_date": "1924-12-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "833",
  "last_page": "833",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 N.C. 833"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 69,
    "char_count": 509,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.494,
    "sha256": "53ce52d12096c084c20250f875bbae5211f7d80603708889daa54a0e1d5e0ee2",
    "simhash": "1:1595678445b8d0b5",
    "word_count": 93
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:44:41.585516+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "R. T. HEATON and D. F. MEHAFFEY v. S. J. CALHOUN and G. I. CALHOUN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee OueiaM.\n\u00a5e have beard tbe arguments of counsel on both sides in tbis case, and read carefully tbe record and briefs. \u00a5e tbink it was a question of fact for tbe jury to determine. We can find no reversible or prejudicial error.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee OueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "D. H. Tillett and D. Witherspoon for plaintiffs.",
      "Moody & Moody for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "R. T. HEATON and D. F. MEHAFFEY v. S. J. CALHOUN and G. I. CALHOUN.\n(Filed 19 December, 1924.)\nAppeal by defendant, G-. I. Calbonn, from Ray, J., and a jury, August Term, 1924, of CheboKEe.\nD. H. Tillett and D. Witherspoon for plaintiffs.\nMoody & Moody for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0833-01",
  "first_page_order": 903,
  "last_page_order": 903
}