{
  "id": 8655349,
  "name": "BENNETT DAY IMPORTING CO. v. W. J. WOODLY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bennett Day Importing Co. v. Woodly",
  "decision_date": "1925-02-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "827",
  "last_page": "828",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "189 N.C. 827"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 1011,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.468,
    "sha256": "65c2c37769341eab1eec5904cf47117f06cb07cc394e8169527c72cf36bba629",
    "simhash": "1:8ea32f0c392c0797",
    "word_count": 168
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:40:32.095485+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BENNETT DAY IMPORTING CO. v. W. J. WOODLY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nPlaintiff sues for goods sold and delivered to the defendant and recovers. The defendant sets up a counterclaim asking damages for breach of warranty in the sale of said goods, and loses on his counterclaim. The controversy, on trial, narrowed itself to an issue of fact, which the jury alone could determine. The record presents no reversible error. The judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. A. Worth for plaintiff.",
      "J. B. Leigh, McMullan & L&Roy for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BENNETT DAY IMPORTING CO. v. W. J. WOODLY.\n(Filed 18 February, 1925.)\nAppeal by defendant from Lyon, J., at September Term, 1924, of Pasquotank.\nCivil action tried upon the following issues:\n\u201c1. Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $785.38, with interest from 2 January, 1922, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: \u2018Yes.\u2019\n\u201c2. Is the plaintiff indebted to the defendant on the counterclaim as alleged in the answer; if so, in what amount? Answer: \u2018Nothing.\u2019 \u201d\n\u2022Judgment on the verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.\nW. A. Worth for plaintiff.\nJ. B. Leigh, McMullan & L&Roy for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0827-02",
  "first_page_order": 905,
  "last_page_order": 906
}