{
  "id": 8655505,
  "name": "ROBT. A. JARRELL v. EDNA COTTON MILLS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jarrell v. Edna Cotton Mills",
  "decision_date": "1925-04-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "836",
  "last_page": "837",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "189 N.C. 836"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 75,
    "char_count": 589,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.477,
    "sha256": "c1f3e22032a719b07428f1013f30ca9112806dd75a0d00073c3a1da1cbf213f8",
    "simhash": "1:d4234bcf5688af34",
    "word_count": 104
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:40:32.095485+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ROBT. A. JARRELL v. EDNA COTTON MILLS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAfter bearing tbe' arguments of counsel, and from a careful reading of tbe record and briefs in tbis case and examination of tbe authorities in tbis jurisdiction, we are of tbe opinion tbat tbe instant ease is governed by tbe principles of law laid down in Butler v. Mfg. Co., 182 N. C., p. 547.\nTbe judgment of tbe court below is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "B. T. Stiers and B. G. Strudwich for plaintiff.",
      "P. W. Glidewell and King, Sapp & King for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ROBT. A. JARRELL v. EDNA COTTON MILLS.\n(Filed 15 April, 1925.)\nAppeal'by plaintiff from McElroy, J., February Term, 1925, of Guileobd.\nB. T. Stiers and B. G. Strudwich for plaintiff.\nP. W. Glidewell and King, Sapp & King for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0836-02",
  "first_page_order": 914,
  "last_page_order": 915
}