#### STATE v. WILLIAM HORTON and OSCAR HORTON.

(Filed 16 September, 1925.)

Appeal by defendants from Cranmer, J., at March Term, 1925, of Gates.

Criminal prosecution, tried upon an indictment, charging tbe defendants witb violations of tbe prohibition law.

From an adverse verdict and judgment pronounced thereon, tbe defendants appeal, assigning errors.

Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.

Bridger & Bley for defendants.

Per Curiam.

Tbe evidence is plenary and conflicting on the issues of defendants’ guilt; it is purely a question of fact; tbe jury has resolved tbe matter against tbe defendants; there is no reversible error appearing on tbe record; tbe verdict and judgments will be upheld.

No error.