{
  "id": 8601756,
  "name": "BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY v. R. S. DICKSON & CO., and STRANAHAN, HARRIS & OATIS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Board of Commissioners v. R. S. Dickson & Co.",
  "decision_date": "1925-10-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "330",
  "last_page": "331",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 N.C. 330"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "142 N. C., 450",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652257
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/142/0450-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "153 N. C., 419",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11272798
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/153/0419-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "151 N. C., 260",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8654512
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/151/0260-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "97 N. C., 89",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8649298
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/97/0089-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1483,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.506,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 3.412121717113371e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8781052486071582
    },
    "sha256": "17b96e990878836689edb1d2b31a36390c2edfac142d72b06a28f49d8dca9710",
    "simhash": "1:1763ce1132b6f3de",
    "word_count": 253
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:29.672014+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY v. R. S. DICKSON & CO., and STRANAHAN, HARRIS & OATIS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Stacy, C. J.\nAs the appellant has filed no brief in this Court, and no error is made to appear from an examination of the record proper, we must affirm the judgment on motion of appellee. Mfg. Co. v. Simmons, 97 N. C., 89; Smith v. Mfg. Co., 151 N. C., 260; Jones v. R. R., 153 N. C., 419; Davis v. Wall, 142 N. C., 450.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Stacy, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Dye & Ciarle for plaintiff.",
      "-No counsel for defendant. '"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY v. R. S. DICKSON & CO., and STRANAHAN, HARRIS & OATIS.\n(Filed 21 October, 1925.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Rules of Court \u2014 Briefs\u2014judgments.\nWhere tbe appellant bas not filed a brief in tbe Supreme Court, under tbe rule tbe judgment appealed from will be affirmed on appellee\u2019s motion, if upon examination of tbe record proper no error appears.\nAppeal by defendant from Sinclair, JSeptember, 1925, at chambers, from CUMBERLAND.\nControversy' without action, submitted on an agreed statement of facts, verified by J. T. Martin, chairman of tbe Board of Commissioners of Cumberland County, and John. S. Harris, Yice-President of Stranahan, Harris & Oatis, Inc.\nTbe proceeding is to determine tbe validity of certain school bonds and tbe binding effect of a joint bid made therefor by tbe defendants.\nTbe case is brought to us for review from a judgment declaring tbe bonds to be valid and adjudging that \u201ctbe defendant herein, tbe purchaser1 of said bonds, be, and it is hereby required to complete tbe purchase of said bonds in conformity with its contract.\u201d\nDye & Ciarle for plaintiff.\n-No counsel for defendant. '"
  },
  "file_name": "0330-01",
  "first_page_order": 434,
  "last_page_order": 435
}