{
  "id": 8606403,
  "name": "STATE v. JOHN WESLEY DAWKINS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Dawkins",
  "decision_date": "1925-11-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "443",
  "last_page": "444",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 N.C. 443"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "188 N. C., 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8653592
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/188/0243-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1860,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.482,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.1589720314299742e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5836297791878986
    },
    "sha256": "4c0a4d3b6f2581d3b1127b0f8ef53ac901764618955f6a5fc1590d7524c8d4b0",
    "simhash": "1:2c200ed59a7ec055",
    "word_count": 319
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:29.672014+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. JOHN WESLEY DAWKINS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Stacy, 0. J.\nIt appears from an inspection of the record now before the Court that Ernest Key and John Wesley Dawkins were tried jointly and both convicted of murder in the first degree at the June Special Term, 1925, of the Superior Court of Forsyth County, and from the statutory judgment of death entered on such conviction, the defendant John Wesley Dawkins appealed.\nNothing but the record proper has been filed in this Court. No case on appeal bas been sent up and no application has been made for a certiorari to have the same brought before the Court for review. The appeal has apparently been abandoned. The defendant has lost every right to have his case heard. It should have been ready for argument at the present term upon the call of the docket from the Eleventh District, to which it belongs. S. v. Farmer, 188 N. C., 243; Finch v. Comrs., ante, 154.\nAs the defendant has failed to prosecute his appeal, and no error is made to appear from an examination of the record proper, we must affirm the judgment on motion of the Attorney-General. Comrs. v. Dickson, ante, 330, and cases there cited.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Stacy, 0. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.",
      "No counsel for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. JOHN WESLEY DAWKINS.\n(Filed 4 November, 1925.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Rules of Court \u2014 Motion to Affirm Judgment \u2014 Record Proper \u2014 Certiorari.\nUpon motion of the Attorney-General when the case is regularly called for argument, on an appeal by defendant, the judgment of the Superior Court will be affirmed when the rules of practice relating to appeals have not been complied with, no motion for a certiorari has been made by the appealing defendant, and from an inspection of the record proper, it does not appear that error has been committed on the trial.\nAppeal by defendant from Shaw, J., at June Special Term, 1925, of Forsyth.\nAttorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.\nNo counsel for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0443-01",
  "first_page_order": 547,
  "last_page_order": 548
}