{
  "id": 8616359,
  "name": "A. S. MIDYETTE v. FARMERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Midyette v. Farmers Manufacturing Co.",
  "decision_date": "1925-09-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "847",
  "last_page": "847",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 N.C. 847"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 92,
    "char_count": 1040,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.434,
    "sha256": "82ceb4587d93ffbeffd1265cd690d87437f0d6d07b534ce0f64cc2b6c61b602b",
    "simhash": "1:836bccb67ea8d459",
    "word_count": 165
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:29.672014+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "A. S. MIDYETTE v. FARMERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nAssignment of error chiefly relied upon by defendant, upon its appeal to this Court, is the refusal of the court to allow its motion for judgment as of nonsuit, at the close of plaintiff\u2019s evidence; C. S., 567. No evidence was offered by defendant. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the allegations of plaintiff. This assignment of error cannot be sustained.\nAssignments of error based upon exceptions to evidence offered by plaintiff, and upon exceptions to the charge of the court are not sustained. The judgment must be affirmed. We find\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ehringhaus & Hall for plaintiff.",
      "Aydlett & Simpson for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "A. S. MIDYETTE v. FARMERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY.\n(Filed 16 September, 1925.)\nAppeal by defendant from judgment rendered at April Term, 1925, of Superior Court of Cueeituok. Cranmer, J. No error.\nAction to recover damages for the destruction of plaintiff\u2019s nets, alleged to bave been burned by fire, negligently set out by defendant. From judgment upon verdict, in favor of plaintiff, defendant appealed.\nEhringhaus & Hall for plaintiff.\nAydlett & Simpson for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0847-01",
  "first_page_order": 951,
  "last_page_order": 951
}