{
  "id": 8617129,
  "name": "WILLIE McNAIR v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD CO.",
  "name_abbreviation": "McNair v. Norfolk Southern Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1925-09-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "853",
  "last_page": "854",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 N.C. 853"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1018,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.471,
    "sha256": "9e1d975809300b1a74119df11a10bf5eb8bb09390bd6f7cba2c21262048fe87b",
    "simhash": "1:13cb14df72b07eee",
    "word_count": 165
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:29.672014+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WILLIE McNAIR v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD CO."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nTbe evidence is conflicting on tbe main issue of liability; it is purely a question of fact; tbe jury bas determined tbe matter against tbe plaintiff; there is no reversible error appearing on tbe record; tbe instruction in regard to tbe \u201cprima facie evidence of negligence,\u201d arising under C. S., 3482, where suit is brought within six months after the cause of action accrued, when considered in connection with other portions of the charge, must be resolved in favor' of the validity of the trial; the verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "P. H. Bell for plaintiff.",
      "Z. V. Norman, Small, MacLean & Rodman for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WILLIE McNAIR v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD CO.\n(Filed 23 September, 1925.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Sinclair, J., at January Term, 1925, of Washington.\nCivil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury and killing of plaintifE\u2019s livestock (mule) by defendant\u2019s engine and cars.\nFrom a verdict and judgment for defendant, tbe plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.\nP. H. Bell for plaintiff.\nZ. V. Norman, Small, MacLean & Rodman for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0853-02",
  "first_page_order": 957,
  "last_page_order": 958
}