{
  "id": 8617596,
  "name": "D. C. McCOTTER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD CO.",
  "name_abbreviation": "McCotter v. Norfolk Southern Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1925-09-30",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "857",
  "last_page": "857",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 N.C. 857"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 96,
    "char_count": 917,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.453,
    "sha256": "570cf2df1e390c4368b670272be1a6728582fd36ce77f8912e9ccd75a841c88d",
    "simhash": "1:160246bdb0e76b12",
    "word_count": 153
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:29.672014+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "D. C. McCOTTER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD CO."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nTbe evidence is conflicting on tbe main issue of liability; it is solely a question of fact; tbe jury has determined tbe matter against tbe plaintiff; there is no reversible error appearing on tbe record; tbe exceptions relating to tbe exclusion of evidence, and tbe one to tbe charge, must be resolved in favor of tbe validity of tbe trial; tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Z. V. Rawls for plaintiff.",
      "Moore & Dunn for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "D. C. McCOTTER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD CO.\n(Filed 30 September, 1925.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Barnhill, J., at May Term, 1925, of Pamlico.\nCivil action tried upon tbe following issue:\n\u201cDid tbe defendant negligently fail to furnish car fit and suitable for .the transportation of tbe potatoes shipped by plaintiff as alleged in tbe complaint? Answer: No.\u201d\nFrom a judgment on tbe verdict in favor of defendant, tbe plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.\nZ. V. Rawls for plaintiff.\nMoore & Dunn for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0857-01",
  "first_page_order": 961,
  "last_page_order": 961
}