{
  "id": 8617952,
  "name": "CHARLES F. DUNN v. JOHN H. DOVE, JESEPHER HURST, TOLSON JARMAN and F. E. WALLACE, Trustee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dunn v. Dove",
  "decision_date": "1925-10-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "860",
  "last_page": "860",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 N.C. 860"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 58,
    "char_count": 463,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.464,
    "sha256": "d77be85e457dd7cb5e89f6763098ecbe860df15f0d8bd0dcd0850794b68fe2d2",
    "simhash": "1:420197c530cd5ebb",
    "word_count": 79
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:29.672014+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CHARLES F. DUNN v. JOHN H. DOVE, JESEPHER HURST, TOLSON JARMAN and F. E. WALLACE, Trustee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee CuRiAM.\nTbe principles of law involved in this case are practically tbe same as those in Dunn v. McKnight, post, 860. On tbe authority in that ease, this case is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee CuRiAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles F. Dunn for plaintiff.",
      "F. E. Wallace and Cowper, Whitaker & Allen for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CHARLES F. DUNN v. JOHN H. DOVE, JESEPHER HURST, TOLSON JARMAN and F. E. WALLACE, Trustee.\n(Filed 7 October, 1925.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Barnhill, J., at August Term, 1925, of LeNOIR.\nAffirmed.\nCharles F. Dunn for plaintiff.\nF. E. Wallace and Cowper, Whitaker & Allen for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0860-01",
  "first_page_order": 964,
  "last_page_order": 964
}