{
  "id": 8618716,
  "name": "STATE v. C. N. RICHARDSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Richardson",
  "decision_date": "1925-10-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "866",
  "last_page": "866",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 N.C. 866"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 963,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.445,
    "sha256": "f4dee52406b97c4ff17959a44afd23f401f1c1c6aab797d748e771c325e2fc2f",
    "simhash": "1:0e004d95e8722ada",
    "word_count": 156
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:29.672014+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. C. N. RICHARDSON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nTbe evidence is conflicting on tbe issue of guilt; it is purely a question of fact; tbe jury has determined tbe matter against tbe defendant; there is no reversible error appearing on tbe record; tbe exceptions relating to tbe alleged insufficiency of tbe evidence, and tbe one to tbe charge, must be resolved in favor of tbe validity of tbe trial; tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brumm/itt and, Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.",
      "F. T. Bennett for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. C. N. RICHARDSON.\n(Filed 14 October, 1925.)\nAppeal by defendant from Daniels, J., at May Term, 1925, of Wake.\nCriminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging tbe defendant witb violating tbe provisions of C. S., 4358, against prostitution, aiding and abetting therein, and operating a place or building for such purposes.\nFrom an adverse verdict and judgment of 20 months on tbe roads, tbe defendant appeals, assigning errors.\nAttorney-General Brumm/itt and, Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.\nF. T. Bennett for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0866-01",
  "first_page_order": 970,
  "last_page_order": 970
}