{
  "id": 8631833,
  "name": "FRED L. POTTS v. CARTER-COBB MOTOR COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Potts v. Carter-Cobb Motor Co.",
  "decision_date": "1926-03-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "821",
  "last_page": "822",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "191 N.C. 821"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 949,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.472,
    "sha256": "47146278309859e5efb3fea2e29855e0239136c2af60de5bed23b3eb3f4c2292",
    "simhash": "1:516f0f319bfba0ca",
    "word_count": 163
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:52:36.568148+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "FRED L. POTTS v. CARTER-COBB MOTOR COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nWe have examined tbe six assignments of error with care and can find no error in law. Tbe jury has found tbe facts for plaintiff.\nIn tbe judgment there is\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "D. L. Ward for plaintiff.",
      "Moore & Dunn for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "FRED L. POTTS v. CARTER-COBB MOTOR COMPANY.\n(Filed 3 March, 1926.)\nAppeal by defendant from Bond, J., and a jury, at October Term, 1925, of CraveN. No error.\nCivil action to recover damages. The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto; were as follows:\n\u201c1. Was the Apperson car destroyed by fire after defendant had received possession of it under the contract sued on? Answer: Yes.\n\u201c2. Was said fire caused by tbe negligence of said Cobb Motor Company? Answer: Yes.\n\u201c3. Wbat damage is plaintiff entitled to recover from defendant? Answer: $356.00.\u201d\nThere was a judgment rendered on tbe verdict. Defendant excepted and assigned error. In tbe record there are six assignments of error made by defendant.\nD. L. Ward for plaintiff.\nMoore & Dunn for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0821-02",
  "first_page_order": 901,
  "last_page_order": 902
}