{
  "id": 8631978,
  "name": "STATE v. J. H. ROGERS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Rogers",
  "decision_date": "1926-04-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "826",
  "last_page": "827",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "191 N.C. 826"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 60,
    "char_count": 500,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.466,
    "sha256": "e3fe7c73c62a329fd9f774a98597acfaae3563a6fa07dec76e6615d833dad040",
    "simhash": "1:11aa9684362c0709",
    "word_count": 78
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:52:36.568148+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. J. H. ROGERS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nTbe defendant was convicted of a breach of tbe prohibition laws. He entered a \u201cbroadside exception\u201d to tbe charge which, of course, cannot be entertained. The other exceptions are purely personal and call for no discussion. They must be overruled.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.",
      "Walser & Walser for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. J. H. ROGERS.\n(Filed 14 April, 1926.)\nAppeal by defendant from Schench, J., at December Term, 1925, of DavidsoN.\nAttorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.\nWalser & Walser for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0826-02",
  "first_page_order": 906,
  "last_page_order": 907
}