{
  "id": 8627383,
  "name": "ALICE SIMMONS v. W. H. SIMMONS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Simmons v. Simmons",
  "decision_date": "1926-11-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "825",
  "last_page": "825",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "192 N.C. 825"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "183 N. C., 139",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8655593
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/183/0139-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "187 N. C., 538",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8654377
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/187/0538-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "188 N. C., 640",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8654686
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/188/0640-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "191 N. C., 740",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8631343
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/191/0740-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1009,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.478,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20728061751862753
    },
    "sha256": "499cb2eb9e0538118f4c42d244728f3551c286f9c0d427cdf7c6a924d22fb67d",
    "simhash": "1:a49056a6b8f7868c",
    "word_count": 173
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:52:38.190415+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ALICE SIMMONS v. W. H. SIMMONS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee CueiaM.\nThis is an action to have a reasonable subsistence and counsel fees paid or secured to the plaintiff from the estate or earnings of the defendant, her husband, as provided in 3 C. S., 1667. The plaintiff\u2019s motion was heard upon the pleadings, the affidavits, and the oral testimony, and it was adjudged that the defendant pay the plaintiff\u2019s attorneys $100 for their services, and that he pay into the office of the clerk $35 a month for the benefit of the plaintiff and her child. The judgment must be affirmed upon the authority of decisions heretofore rendered, there being no charge of adultery against the plaintiff. McManus v. McManus, 191 N. C., 740; Price v. Price, 188 N. C., 640; Barbee v. Barbee, 187 N. C., 538; Anderson v. Anderson, 183 N. C., 139.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee CueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "McLendon .& Covington for plaintiff.",
      "Enos T. Edwards and Vann & Milliken for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ALICE SIMMONS v. W. H. SIMMONS.\n(Filed 17 November, 1926.)\nAppeal by defendant from Schenck, J., at June Term, 1926, of ANSON. Affirmed.\nMcLendon .& Covington for plaintiff.\nEnos T. Edwards and Vann & Milliken for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0825-01",
  "first_page_order": 899,
  "last_page_order": 899
}