{
  "id": 8627461,
  "name": "RONALD GREENE v. L. B. JACKSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Greene v. Jackson",
  "decision_date": "1926-12-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "829",
  "last_page": "829",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "192 N.C. 829"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "190 N. C., 789",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8614657
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/190/0789-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 1435,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.458,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2072821620102176
    },
    "sha256": "c7ca1d99d7fc202ea7867664669445761c33cfd7e8b9947f6575963cbf677a3a",
    "simhash": "1:cfcad445d5921ceb",
    "word_count": 246
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:52:38.190415+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "RONALD GREENE v. L. B. JACKSON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam.\nThis case was before ns on demurrer at the Fall Term,. 1925, 190 N. C., 789. On the second trial in th\u00e9 Superior Court, from which the present appeal is prosecuted, the controversy narrowed itself principally to issues of fact, determinable alone by a jury. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error, even though some of the rulings are not altogether free from difficulty.\nWe have concluded that the exceptions relating to the admission and exclusion of evidence, and those to the charge, should be resolved in favor of the validity of the trial. The case presents no new question of law, or one not heretofore settled by our decisions. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Marie W. Brown and Glinton K. Hughes for plaintiff.",
      "Lee, Ford & Goxe for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "RONALD GREENE v. L. B. JACKSON.\n(Filed 15 December, 1926.)\nAppeal from Armfield, Emergency Judge, at May Term, 1926, of BlJNCOMBE.\nCivil action to recover damages for an alleged breach of a rental contract.\nFrom a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.\nMarie W. Brown and Glinton K. Hughes for plaintiff.\nLee, Ford & Goxe for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0829-01",
  "first_page_order": 903,
  "last_page_order": 903
}