{
  "id": 8627498,
  "name": "ROBERT L. SMITH v. PAUL CHATHAM et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. Chatham",
  "decision_date": "1926-12-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "831",
  "last_page": "832",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "192 N.C. 831"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1052,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.451,
    "sha256": "7f56b1bd80d4782ecc828d0bc78c5e0bde3938bf44b1aa24b8f49d919ff1d3d3",
    "simhash": "1:4fc2d0cf5360b9cc",
    "word_count": 171
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:52:38.190415+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ROBERT L. SMITH v. PAUL CHATHAM et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee CuRiAM.\nThe controversy on trial narrowed itself principally to issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the ease has been tried substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee CuRiAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. B. Justice and John M. Robinson for plaintiff.",
      "Gansler & Cansler and H. L. Taylor for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ROBERT L. SMITH v. PAUL CHATHAM et al.\n(Filed 15 December, 1926.)\nAppeal by defendant, Paul Chatham, from Harding, J., at February Term, 1926, of MeceleNbueg.\nCivil action'to recover plaintiff\u2019s part of commissions arising from tbe negotiation of leases between landowners and F. W. Woolwortb & Company for storehouses situate in Concord, Monroe, Gastonia, Shelby and High Point.\nFrom a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, tbe defendant appeals, assigning errors.\nA. B. Justice and John M. Robinson for plaintiff.\nGansler & Cansler and H. L. Taylor for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0831-01",
  "first_page_order": 905,
  "last_page_order": 906
}