{
  "id": 8627531,
  "name": "STATE v. EXUM HOOKS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hooks",
  "decision_date": "1926-12-31",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "832",
  "last_page": "833",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "192 N.C. 832"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 60,
    "char_count": 512,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.447,
    "sha256": "7d2864119f394b1305320a75b9f3272d008a15277273635320fb039a942d1875",
    "simhash": "1:1dbccf860ca6adff",
    "word_count": 81
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:52:38.190415+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. EXUM HOOKS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nTbe defendant was prosecuted for Laving liquor in bis possession for the purpose of sale and was convicted. We have examined the several assignments of error and find that under numerous decisions all the exceptions must be overruled.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.",
      "J. Faison Thompson and Hugh Dortch for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. EXUM HOOKS.\n(Filed 31 December, 1926.)\nAppeal by defendant from Granmer, J., at August Term, 1926, of WayNe. No error.\nAttorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.\nJ. Faison Thompson and Hugh Dortch for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0832-02",
  "first_page_order": 906,
  "last_page_order": 907
}