{
  "id": 2217696,
  "name": "J. M. WILSON et al. v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF GUILFORD COUNTY et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wilson v. Board of Commissioners",
  "decision_date": "1927-03-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "386",
  "last_page": "386",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "193 N.C. 386"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 106,
    "char_count": 1008,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.455,
    "sha256": "ac71d9c409a33c22c0f22d09ed888d7b2b746ad97fd9cb20277860953278e810",
    "simhash": "1:5f645cc212273774",
    "word_count": 163
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:08:43.639996+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. M. WILSON et al. v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF GUILFORD COUNTY et. al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nSince this ease was argued in this Court, chapter -559, Public-Local Laws of 1925, was repealed by House Bill 53, Senate Bill 114, duly enacted by the General Assembly of 1927. The question therefore presented by the record is now merely academic and the decision thereof by this Court would be a useless performance, and the appeal is\nDismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "King, 8app c& Xing for plaintiffs.",
      "James J. Iloge and E. S. Parker, Jr., for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. M. WILSON et al. v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF GUILFORD COUNTY et. al.\n(Filed 16 March, 1927.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Statutes\u2014Repealing Statutes \u2014 Constitutional Law.\nThe later repeal of a statute attacked for its alleged unconstitutionality renders unnecessary the decision of the Supreme Court on the facts of this case.\nCivil action, before Lyon, J., at March. Term, 1926, of Guilford.\nThis action was instituted to test the constitutionality of chapter 559, Public-Local Laws of 1925. From judgment, declaring the act unconstitional, the defendants appeal.\nKing, 8app c& Xing for plaintiffs.\nJames J. Iloge and E. S. Parker, Jr., for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0386-01",
  "first_page_order": 464,
  "last_page_order": 464
}