{
  "id": 2217672,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA on Relation of North Carolina Corporation Commission, v. HARNETT COUNTY TRUST COMPANY (a Corporation)",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Harnett County Trust Co.",
  "decision_date": "1927-03-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "834",
  "last_page": "834",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "193 N.C. 834"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "109 N. C., 182",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8649775
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/109/0182-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "156 N. C., 44",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11270069
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/156/0044-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "172 N. C., 632",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11255077
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/172/0632-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "191 N. C., 215",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8628372
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/191/0215-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 838,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.509,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.07752826516140517
    },
    "sha256": "f87d65bcde194e5b6335df3322810246f9112cd55817d8611294c02cf952c5e8",
    "simhash": "1:52a58066420a410c",
    "word_count": 141
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:08:43.639996+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA on Relation of North Carolina Corporation Commission, v. HARNETT COUNTY TRUST COMPANY (a Corporation)."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe appellants entered a special appearance and moved that as to them the action be dismissed. The motion was denied, and they excepted and appealed.\nThe appeal must be dismissed. It is fragmentary and premature. An appeal from an interlocutory order will not ordinarily be entertained. Watts v. Staton, 191 N. C., 215; Bradshaw v. Bank, 172 N. C., 632; Mann v. Gibbs, 156 N. C., 44; Turner v. Holden, 109 N. C., 182; Guilford v. Georgia Co., ibid., 310.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Clifford & Townsend and Charles Ross for appellants.",
      "A. A. F. Seaw\u00e9ll and K. R. Hoyle for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA on Relation of North Carolina Corporation Commission, v. HARNETT COUNTY TRUST COMPANY (a Corporation).\n(Filed 2 March, 1927.)\nAppeal by B. P. Gentry et al. from Cranmer, J., at November Term, 1926, of Harnett.\nAppeal dismissed.\nClifford & Townsend and Charles Ross for appellants.\nA. A. F. Seaw\u00e9ll and K. R. Hoyle for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0834-01",
  "first_page_order": 912,
  "last_page_order": 912
}