{
  "id": 2217687,
  "name": "STATE v. ARTHUR CARPENTER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Carpenter",
  "decision_date": "1927-05-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "848",
  "last_page": "848",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "193 N.C. 848"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "187 N. C., 400",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8653891
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/187/0400-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "166 N. C., 333",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11269618
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/166/0333-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 87,
    "char_count": 765,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.467,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.07752903740720019
    },
    "sha256": "d424b6e6ff63efc9763fa2347b2d62e2c1022585d5e82c2670ce6a90cc86c9f2",
    "simhash": "1:908e1ecf3fc0befb",
    "word_count": 123
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:08:43.639996+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. ARTHUR CARPENTER."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe defendant\u2019s exceptions must be overruled. The fact that McGinnis may have been a notorious \u201cblind tiger\u201d could not have availed the defendant. . S. v. Lane, 166 N. C., 333. There was evidence that the defendant\u2019s admission was voluntary, and for this reason the third and fifth exceptions are untenable. The instruction as to the defendant\u2019s possession'of the liquor is sustained by S. v. McAllister, 187 N. C., 400. The other exceptions are without merit and require no discussion.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.",
      "B. B. Warren and George W. Wilson for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. ARTHUR CARPENTER.\n(Filed 4 May, 1927.)\nAppeal by defendant from Schenck, J., at October Term, 1926, of Gaston.\nNo error.\nAttorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.\nB. B. Warren and George W. Wilson for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0848-01",
  "first_page_order": 926,
  "last_page_order": 926
}