#### CHARLOTTE-CONCORD BUS LINE v. GIBBONS TRANSFER COMPANY.

(Filed 30 November, 1927.)

Appeal by defendant fr'om' Schenck, J., at February Term, 1927, of Cabarrus.

No error.

Hartsell & Hartsell for plaintiff.

P. W. Garland and Armfield, Armfield, Sherrin & Barnhardt for defendant.

Per Curiam.

Tbe plaintiff brought .suit to recover damages for injury to its bus alleged to have been caused by tbe defendant’s negligence. Tbe defendant answered, denying tbe plaintiff’s allegations, and set up a cross-action for tbe recovery of damages against tbe plaintiff. Tbe alleged causes arose from a collision on a public highway between tbe plaintiff’s bus and tbe defendant’s moving van. Appropriate issues were submitted upon both causes and were answered in favor of tbe plaintiff.

We find upon an examination of tbe record that the controversy between tbe parties has been tried and determined in substantial compliance with tbe controlling principles of law and that tbe appellant has shown no sufficient cause for our disturbing the verdict or tbe judgment.

No error.