{
  "id": 8619803,
  "name": "J. M. EDGERTON v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Edgerton v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1927-09-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "791",
  "last_page": "791",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "194 N.C. 791"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "270 U. S., 416",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        6140905
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/270/0416-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "189 N. C., 63",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8653450
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/189/0063-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1184,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.493,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2072022345704325
    },
    "sha256": "fe36c50ae0a63c07a1028361583c49a42493f3baa4deabdc3499eefbb371f449",
    "simhash": "1:51228ab2fb3830ea",
    "word_count": 208
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:29.544042+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. M. EDGERTON v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe court below charged the jury clearly and accurately the law of actionable negligence applicable to the facts in the case.\nFrom a careful reading of the record we can find no prejudicial or reversible error.\nThe action is similar and tried in accordance to the law as set forth in Farming Co. v. R. R., 189 N. C., 63. The same principle is set forth in C. & O. R. R. Co. v. Thompson Mfg. Co., 270 U. S., 416, 70 L. Ed., 659.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Kenneth G. Boy all and Jack Joyner for plaintiff.",
      "Dickinson & Freeman and W. B. B. Gui\u00f3n for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. M. EDGERTON v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY.\n(Filed 28 September, 1927.)\nAppeal by defendant from Harris, J., and a jury, at April Term, 1927, of 'Wayne.\nNo error.\nThis was an action for damages brought by plaintiff against defendant for negligence in transporting forty-six mules from National Stock Yards, Ill., to Goldsboro, N. C.\nThe issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto were as follows: \u2022\n\u201c1. Were the mules of the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant railroad company? Answer: Yes.\n\u201c2. In what amount, if any, is defendant indebted to plaintiff? Answer: $633.00, with interest.\u201d\nKenneth G. Boy all and Jack Joyner for plaintiff.\nDickinson & Freeman and W. B. B. Gui\u00f3n for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0791-01",
  "first_page_order": 859,
  "last_page_order": 859
}