{
  "id": 8620144,
  "name": "STATE v. REUBEN GUTHRIE, WILLIAM BELL and BENNIE GARNER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Guthrie",
  "decision_date": "1927-09-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "794",
  "last_page": "794",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "194 N.C. 794"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 58,
    "char_count": 500,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.461,
    "sha256": "c56027e667a646dd7bfd39263cf81180d45708609d6556b85145adeb1f929e0a",
    "simhash": "1:5b81aaa9713cd44e",
    "word_count": 82
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:29.544042+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. REUBEN GUTHRIE, WILLIAM BELL and BENNIE GARNER."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nFrom a careful.reading of the record in this action we are of the opinion that the evidence was not sufficient to be submitted to the jury. The judgment in the court below is\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.",
      "S. E. Newberry for defendant, William Bell."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. REUBEN GUTHRIE, WILLIAM BELL and BENNIE GARNER.\n(Filed 28 September, 1927.)\nAppeal by William Bell from Grcmmer, J., and a jury, at March Term, 1927, of Cartebet.\nReversed.\nAttorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.\nS. E. Newberry for defendant, William Bell."
  },
  "file_name": "0794-01",
  "first_page_order": 862,
  "last_page_order": 862
}