{
  "id": 8621215,
  "name": "PAGE TRUST COMPANY and S. O. BAUERSFELD, Receivers of the Bank of Hamlet, v. R. LEVIN, H. LEVIN and J. LEVIN, Copartners, Trading as R., H. and J. Levin",
  "name_abbreviation": "Page Trust Co. v. Levin",
  "decision_date": "1927-11-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "807",
  "last_page": "807",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "194 N.C. 807"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "19 S. E., 371",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "114 N. C., 321",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8650270
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/114/0321-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "129 S. E., 818",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "190 N. C., 368",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8603524
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/190/0368-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "139 S. E., 596",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1059,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.478,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20721034315128026
    },
    "sha256": "986a5106f3cb2e2716714336ec20596504620be2c2d8c39d50954c414de59163",
    "simhash": "1:5aae1c10dbe0822c",
    "word_count": 194
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:29.544042+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "PAGE TRUST COMPANY and S. O. BAUERSFELD, Receivers of the Bank of Hamlet, v. R. LEVIN, H. LEVIN and J. LEVIN, Copartners, Trading as R., H. and J. Levin."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nTbe case is controlled by what was said in Coburn v. Carstarphen, ante, 368, 139 S. E., 596; Williams v. Coleman, 190 N. C., 368, 129 S. E., 818, and Davis v. Mfg. Co., 114 N. C., 321, 19 S. E., 371. Tbe judgment must be upheld on authority of these cases.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bynum & Henry for plaintiffs.",
      "W. B. Jones for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "PAGE TRUST COMPANY and S. O. BAUERSFELD, Receivers of the Bank of Hamlet, v. R. LEVIN, H. LEVIN and J. LEVIN, Copartners, Trading as R., H. and J. Levin.\n(Filed 16 November, 1927.)\nAppeal by plaintiif from Lyon, Special Judge, at March Term, 1927, of BlCHMOND.\nCivil action to recover balance alleged to be due on promissory note.\nDefendants claimed a set-off to tbe amount of moneys bad on deposit in tbe Bank of Hamlet at tbe time of its closing.\nUpon tbe facts found by tbe judge, by consent, sitting as both judge and jury, a trial by tbe latter being waived, judgment was entered for tbe defendants for tbe excess of tbe amount on deposit over tbe balance due on tbe note in suit. Plaintiffs appeal, assigning error.\nBynum & Henry for plaintiffs.\nW. B. Jones for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0807-02",
  "first_page_order": 875,
  "last_page_order": 875
}