{
  "id": 8621373,
  "name": "C. D. BUCHANAN v. B. & D. COACH LINE, Inc., et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Buchanan v. B. & D. Coach Line, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "1927-12-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "812",
  "last_page": "813",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "194 N.C. 812"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "96 S. E., 650",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "176 N. C., 5",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8654891
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/176/0005-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 123,
    "char_count": 1203,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.481,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2072118876428703
    },
    "sha256": "f78b57c6293c8315387130802cf02abcdb8c6b302fdde7b9fd9bf12daa9a28ca",
    "simhash": "1:aa0522353a0e8152",
    "word_count": 208
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:29.544042+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "C. D. BUCHANAN v. B. & D. COACH LINE, Inc., et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Oueiam.\nTbis is an appeal by tbe defendant, B. & D. Coach Line, Inc., from a refusal to set aside a judgment awarding plaintiff damages for personal injuries sustained while a passenger in one of the defendant\u2019s busses, on 8 November, 1926. The judge found that the defendant had a meritorious defense, hut that it had shown no \u201cmistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect\u201d in allowing judgment to be taken in the action. C. S., 600.\nUpon the facts found by the trial court and embodied in the judgment, we see no valid reason for disturbing his ruling on the motion. Cahoon v. Brinkley, 176 N. C., 5, 96 S. E., 650. It would serve no useful purpose to set out the judgment in full.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Oueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Morgan & Ragland for plaintiff.",
      "Walter G. Feimster and Hester & Rooker for defendant, B. & D. Goach Line, Inc."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "C. D. BUCHANAN v. B. & D. COACH LINE, Inc., et al.\n(Filed 7 December, 1927.)\nAppeal by defendant, B. & D. Coach Line, Inc., from Parher, J., at June Term, 1927, of McDowell.\nMotion to set aside judgment rendered on a verdict awarding the plaintiff $500 as damages in a suit for personal injuries, at the Spring-Term, 1927, McDowell Superior Court. Motion denied, and defendant appeals.\nMorgan & Ragland for plaintiff.\nWalter G. Feimster and Hester & Rooker for defendant, B. & D. Goach Line, Inc."
  },
  "file_name": "0812-02",
  "first_page_order": 880,
  "last_page_order": 881
}