{
  "id": 8629708,
  "name": "T. L. CAVES v. ERWIN COTTON MILLS COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Caves v. Erwin Cotton Mills Co.",
  "decision_date": "1928-03-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "404",
  "last_page": "404",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 N.C. 404"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1138,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.443,
    "sha256": "e5831eb56ffe811b5ed5081609ab9ce7df65eaf85655f1e6a2039f929137691c",
    "simhash": "1:9b0a1a1fe04643da",
    "word_count": 189
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:22:12.241767+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "T. L. CAVES v. ERWIN COTTON MILLS COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cubiam.\nThe plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have been caused by the defendant\u2019s negligence. He alleged that while engaged in marking the name of a purchaser on bundles of cloth he was injured by the falling on his left leg of a bale which had negligently been stored on its round end. At the close of the evidence the action was dismissed as in case of nonsuit. The testimony discloses an alleged injury resulting from an accident \u2014 an event proceeding from an unknown cause or an unusual and unexpected event from a known cause. The judgment is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Briit & Britt and Charles B. Britt for plaintiff.",
      "Varser, Lawrence, Proctor & McIntyre for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "T. L. CAVES v. ERWIN COTTON MILLS COMPANY.\n(Filed 28 March, 1928.)\nNegligence \u2014 Acts or Omissions Constitute Negligence in General.\nAn action to recover damages'\u2019for a negligent injury will be dismissed when the evidence discloses that it resulted from an accident from an unknown cause or a known cause which could not have been reasonably anticipated.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Bond, J., at December Term, 1927, of RobesoN.\nAffirmed.\nBriit & Britt and Charles B. Britt for plaintiff.\nVarser, Lawrence, Proctor & McIntyre for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0404-01",
  "first_page_order": 476,
  "last_page_order": 476
}