{
  "id": 8632349,
  "name": "MRS. GLADYS PARKER COTTEN v. LAUREL PARK ESTATES, Inc., CENTRAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, STANDARD MORTGAGE COMPANY, E. E. REID, YATES ARLEDGE, H. WALTER FULLER, and A. O. GREYNOLDS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cotten v. Laurel Park Estates, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "1928-01-31",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "848",
  "last_page": "849",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 N.C. 848"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "193 N. C., 200",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        2217755
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/193/0200-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "193 N. C., 17",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        2217742
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/193/0017-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "192 N. C., 484",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8624025
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/192/0484-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "189 N. C., 256",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8653985
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/189/0256-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 210,
    "char_count": 2548,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.518,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.973126083369309e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3717517893900378
    },
    "sha256": "504519e42582d58b89f082eadde9af324f345995a257f89e1c20f178a2b57213",
    "simhash": "1:d458b9d9e042b0c8",
    "word_count": 421
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:22:12.241767+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MRS. GLADYS PARKER COTTEN v. LAUREL PARK ESTATES, Inc., CENTRAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, STANDARD MORTGAGE COMPANY, E. E. REID, YATES ARLEDGE, H. WALTER FULLER, and A. O. GREYNOLDS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe defendants demurred for misjoinder of causes of action and for misjoinder of parties, and appealed to the Supreme Court from the judgment overruling tbe demurrer.\nThe defendants argue, with persuasive but not convincing reasoning, that there is a misjoinder of causes of action and parties. That the complaint is bad for multifariousness; that the complaint contains inconsistent and contradictory causes of action. We cannot so interpret it. Taking the three causes of action, although inartificially set forth, as a whole \u2014 not disconnectedly \u2014 we think under a liberal construction, \u201cwith a view to substantial justice between the parties,\u201d it is one connected story \u2014 a common scheme, or plot; practically a conspiracy. Tbe complaint alleges an actionable fraud of the most nefarious kind, connecting all of the defendants and charging, with particularity, all of them with full knowledge and complicity. The causes of action arise out of the same transaction or transaction connected with the same subject of action. All flow from the same source, all are woven together, yoked together, in a scheme, plot or conspiracy to defraud the plaintiff. \u201cIf the fountain is tainted, so likewise is the water that flows from it into all the streams.\u201d Fisher v. Trust Co., 138 N. C., at p. 228. On a demurrer, the facts as stated in the complaint are taken as true. Tbe entire matter can be settled by proper issues in one action. C. S., 456; C. S., 507; C. S., 535; Fisher v. Trust Co., 138 N. C., p. 224; Robinson v. Williams, 189 N. C., 256; Wadford v. Davis, 192 N. C., 484; Killian v. Hanna, 193 N. C., 17; S. v. McCanless, 193 N. C., 200. Tbe judgment of the court below is\nAffirmed'.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Carswell & Ervin and John M. Robinson for plaintiff.",
      "Hunter M. Jones, Merrick, Barnard & \u00c9eazel and Tillett, Tillett & Kennedy for Centrad Bank and Trust Company and Standard Mortgage Company.",
      "Kester Walton for E. E. Reid."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MRS. GLADYS PARKER COTTEN v. LAUREL PARK ESTATES, Inc., CENTRAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, STANDARD MORTGAGE COMPANY, E. E. REID, YATES ARLEDGE, H. WALTER FULLER, and A. O. GREYNOLDS.\n(Filed 31 January, 1928.)\nPleadings \u2014 Demurrer\u2014Misjoinder of Parties and Causes.\nJ\u00ede\u00ed\u00ed\u00ed, in this case a cause of actionable fraud was alleged connecting all the parties with the grounds thereof, and is not demurrable for mis-joinder of parties and causes of action.\nAppeal by defendants, Central Bank and Trust Company, Standard Mortgage Company, and E. E. Reid, from Lyon, Emergency Judge, at September Term, 1927, of Meckleebubg.\nAffirmed.\nCarswell & Ervin and John M. Robinson for plaintiff.\nHunter M. Jones, Merrick, Barnard & \u00c9eazel and Tillett, Tillett & Kennedy for Centrad Bank and Trust Company and Standard Mortgage Company.\nKester Walton for E. E. Reid."
  },
  "file_name": "0848-01",
  "first_page_order": 920,
  "last_page_order": 921
}