{
  "id": 8632554,
  "name": "STATE v. SAREE OSBORNE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Osborne",
  "decision_date": "1928-03-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "858",
  "last_page": "858",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 N.C. 858"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 70,
    "char_count": 617,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.448,
    "sha256": "bc831623ceb3205fa67e8d14ee5862de9fab950fe71ddef2dcd1dbf93fd2611b",
    "simhash": "1:5e0343bd02ad3909",
    "word_count": 96
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:22:12.241767+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. SAREE OSBORNE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nThe State moved to dismiss the appeal for failure to docket in proper time. As the exceptions are without merit, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.",
      "S. H. Newberry and Sutton & Greene for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. SAREE OSBORNE.\n(Filed 14 March, 1928.)\nAppeal by defendant from Crammer, J., at October Term, 1927, of I/ENOIR.\nCriminal prosecution tried upon a warrant charging the defendant with violations of the prohibition law.\nFrom an adverse verdict and judgment pronounced thereon, the defendant noted an appeal.\nAttorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.\nS. H. Newberry and Sutton & Greene for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0858-02",
  "first_page_order": 930,
  "last_page_order": 930
}