{
  "id": 8632820,
  "name": "STATE v. DAVE GARLAND",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Garland",
  "decision_date": "1928-05-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "876",
  "last_page": "876",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 N.C. 876"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 150,
    "char_count": 1571,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.466,
    "sha256": "5b2fc5c821063050f92d00bdae06fcc48ac8c0c1befd66063be0fb391d985595",
    "simhash": "1:952d01bf5fb2a9dd",
    "word_count": 263
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:22:12.241767+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. DAVE GARLAND."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nThe record contains a number of exceptions which were the subject of earnest debate before us, and while they are not altogether free from difficulty, a careful perusal of the entire record leaves us with the impression that no reversible error was committed on the trial.\nNo benefit could be derived from detailing the evidence, as it was sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and the defendant\u2019s motion for nonsuit was properly overruled.\nThere are several expressions in the charge, which, standing alone, might be subject to some criticism, but reading the charge contextually and as a whole, as we are required to do, it would seem to be free from reversible error. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.",
      "A. Hall J ohnston and Charles Hutchins for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. DAVE GARLAND.\n(Filed 16 May, 1928.)\nAppeal by defendant from Moore, J., at October Term, 1927, of Yancey.\nCriminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging the defendant with the murder of one Lonnie McMahan on 4 July, 1927.\nWhen the case yas called for trial the solicitor announced that the State would not ask for a verdict of murder in the first degree, but would ask for a verdict of murder in the second degree, or manslaughter, as the evidence might disclose. The defendant entered a plea of not guilty. .\n. Verdict: Guilty of manslaughter.\nJudgment,: Imprisonment in the State\u2019s prison for a period of not less than 10 nor more than 15 years.\nDefendant appeals, assigning errors.\nAttorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.\nA. Hall J ohnston and Charles Hutchins for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0876-01",
  "first_page_order": 948,
  "last_page_order": 948
}