{
  "id": 8626210,
  "name": "MRS. M. J. M. WEIR, Individually, and MRS. M. J. M. WEIR and W. H. HOOD, Executors of the Will of JOHN H. WEIR, Deceased, v. CLIFFORD FOWLER, Sheriff of Union County, and W. H. COLLINS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Weir v. Fowler",
  "decision_date": "1928-11-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "270",
  "last_page": "271",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "196 N.C. 270"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "94 N. C., 443",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8651272
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/94/0443-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "64 N. C., 69",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8681252
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/64/0069-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 142,
    "char_count": 1621,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.494,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20726034606650812
    },
    "sha256": "f2c9bb480ab4108753d31db2bd575e059659ab768eb94b5ae6e8c41c35469463",
    "simhash": "1:e07e2e95325e81e0",
    "word_count": 280
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:28:30.620798+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MRS. M. J. M. WEIR, Individually, and MRS. M. J. M. WEIR and W. H. HOOD, Executors of the Will of JOHN H. WEIR, Deceased, v. CLIFFORD FOWLER, Sheriff of Union County, and W. H. COLLINS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Stacy, 0. J.\nThis is a companion case to Weir v. Weir, ante, 268. Plaintiffs instituted the present action to restrain the sheriff from delivering deed for the lands sold under execution, until a hearing could be had on their motion, made in the original cause, to have said sale set aside and the same declared void. This was unnecessary, as the same relief, if needed, could have been obtained by motion in the original cause. Indeed, the granting of an order nisi to set aside an irregular execution, in such proceeding, operates, as soon as the parties have notice of it, to stay any further action. Foard v. Alexander, 64 N. C., 69; Long v. Jarrett, 94 N. C., 443.\nError.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Stacy, 0. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "H. B. Adams for. plaintiffs.",
      "John O. Silces for defendants^"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MRS. M. J. M. WEIR, Individually, and MRS. M. J. M. WEIR and W. H. HOOD, Executors of the Will of JOHN H. WEIR, Deceased, v. CLIFFORD FOWLER, Sheriff of Union County, and W. H. COLLINS.\n(Filed 14 November, 1928.)\nInjunctions \u2014 Preliminary and Interlocutory Injunctions \u2014 Grounds Therefor.\nIn an action to declare a sale of land under execution of judgment void, the remedy of restraining further proceedings under the sale is by motion in the original cause, and a separate action for a restraining order is unnecessary.\nAppeal by defendants from Deal, J., at Chambers in Wadesboro, 7 March, 1928. From UnioN.\nCivil action to enjoin the sheriff of Union County from delivering deed for certain lands to W. H. Collins, the last and highest bidder at an execution sale.\nUpon the return of the temporary order, the same was continued to the hearing. Defendants appeal, assigning errors.\nH. B. Adams for. plaintiffs.\nJohn O. Silces for defendants^"
  },
  "file_name": "0270-01",
  "first_page_order": 350,
  "last_page_order": 351
}