{
  "id": 8629836,
  "name": "W. R. KEEN v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Keen v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1928-09-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "801",
  "last_page": "801",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "196 N.C. 801"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 73,
    "char_count": 578,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.478,
    "sha256": "9634a9d252a57a321e2b58c4312bf19e50ee217a636c99249030b3799e5236e9",
    "simhash": "1:f364cb251587ae6b",
    "word_count": 96
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:28:30.620798+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. R. KEEN v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee OueiaM.\nTbis is an action for actionable negligence brought by plaintiff against defendant for injury to an automobile by defendant\u2019s train at Barber Street crossing, in the town of Four Oaks, N. 0.\nFrom a perusal of the evidence, we are of the opinion that the judgment of nonsuit in the court below should be sustained.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee OueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Edward F. Ward and Wellons & Wellons for plaintiff.",
      "Abell & Shepard for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. R. KEEN v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY.\n(Filed 19 September, 1928.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Nunn, J., at April Term, 1928, of JohustoN.\nAffirmed.\nEdward F. Ward and Wellons & Wellons for plaintiff.\nAbell & Shepard for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0801-01",
  "first_page_order": 881,
  "last_page_order": 881
}