{
  "id": 8629918,
  "name": "EDWIN TRIPP and ANNIE TRIPP v. L. F. WORTHINGTON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Tripp v. Worthington",
  "decision_date": "1928-09-26",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "803",
  "last_page": "803",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "196 N.C. 803"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 117,
    "char_count": 1273,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.486,
    "sha256": "0326c556c7dcec1235abf80ed223c01bab8ffd8ae14a26bcae4bd709146fef9d",
    "simhash": "1:2e16d8ed904307ca",
    "word_count": 214
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:28:30.620798+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "EDWIN TRIPP and ANNIE TRIPP v. L. F. WORTHINGTON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis is an action for ejectment instituted by plaintiffs against defendant. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant has wrongfully, unlawfully, and wilfully and without any right, title or interest thereto, entered upon and taken possession of a part of a tract of land owned by plaintiffs. The land in controversy is about an acre and defendant\u2019s, L. E. Worthington\u2019s, entry thereon is wrongful, unlawful, illegal and contrary to law.\nThe defendant in answer denies the allegations of plaintiffs. The defendant also sets up adverse possession. The following issue and the answer thereto was submitted to the jury:\n1. What is the true dividing line between the lands of the plaintiffs and the defendant ? A. From A to B.\nThe answer to the issue sustained plaintiff\u2019s contention.\nThe plaintiffs and defendant agreed that there was- only the one issue\u2014 the true dividing line between them. This was a question of fact. The probative force of the evidence was for the jury to determine. We can discover no error in law.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. Q. Lanier for plaintiff.",
      "S. 0. Worthington and S. J. Everett for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "EDWIN TRIPP and ANNIE TRIPP v. L. F. WORTHINGTON.\n(Filed 26 September, 1928.)\nAppeal by defendant from Nunn, J., at August Term, 1928, of Pitt.\nNo error.\nJ. Q. Lanier for plaintiff.\nS. 0. Worthington and S. J. Everett for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0803-01",
  "first_page_order": 883,
  "last_page_order": 883
}