{
  "id": 8630222,
  "name": "B. S. LAWRENCE v. C. C. CHEEK et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lawrence v. Cheek",
  "decision_date": "1928-12-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "816",
  "last_page": "816",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "196 N.C. 816"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1017,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.464,
    "sha256": "9029696c2d6225d05864d8482423717c4620ed15d73483782189606a24f504fb",
    "simhash": "1:e80fdc2b6aad00fd",
    "word_count": 168
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:28:30.620798+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "B. S. LAWRENCE v. C. C. CHEEK et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Peb Curiam:.\nThe exceptive assignments of error, upon which appellants rely, relate to the admission and exclusion of evidence. The charge is not in the record, and the exceptions addressed to the refusal of the court to grant the defendants\u2019 motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made first at the close of plaintiff\u2019s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence, have been abandoned.\nWe find no error on the record which entitles the defendants to a new trial. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Peb Curiam:."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. A. Spence and H. M. Robins for plaintiff.",
      "Q. N. Gox and Brittain, Brittain & Brittain for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "B. S. LAWRENCE v. C. C. CHEEK et al.\n(Filed 5 December, 1928.)\nAppeal by defendants from Townsend, Special Judge, at March Term, 1928, of RANDOLPH.\nCivil action for damages to plaintiff\u2019s property, resulting from deterioration while in defendants\u2019 possession, a replevy bond having been given to hold same.\nMerdict and judgment for plaintiff, from which defendants appeal, assigning errors.\nJ. A. Spence and H. M. Robins for plaintiff.\nQ. N. Gox and Brittain, Brittain & Brittain for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0816-01",
  "first_page_order": 896,
  "last_page_order": 896
}