{
  "id": 8630264,
  "name": "ABRAHAM YOUNG v. JOHN HEDDEN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Young v. Hedden",
  "decision_date": "1928-12-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "817",
  "last_page": "817",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "196 N.C. 817"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 72,
    "char_count": 606,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.477,
    "sha256": "b5c81d74417886b88138c2e12a83c8d97c03bf6f123f211393d80c09cc0b2bef",
    "simhash": "1:e50a2564511f8b54",
    "word_count": 101
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:28:30.620798+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ABRAHAM YOUNG v. JOHN HEDDEN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for the alleged negligence of the defendant in setting out fire and burning the plaintiff\u2019s timber and grass. At the conclusion of all the evidence the defendant\u2019s motion for nonsuit was allowed. The plaintiff excepted and appealed. We find no error in this ruling and affirm the judgment.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. F. Ray and R. D. Sisk for plaintiff.",
      "Geo. B. Patton and J ones <& J ones for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ABRAHAM YOUNG v. JOHN HEDDEN.\n(Filed 19 December, 1928.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from MacRae, Special Judge, at Spring Term, 1928, of MacoN.\nAffirmed.\nJ. F. Ray and R. D. Sisk for plaintiff.\nGeo. B. Patton and J ones <& J ones for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0817-01",
  "first_page_order": 897,
  "last_page_order": 897
}